Discussion for article #227764
Other than preventing a Republican from getting the White House, does anyone know why Hillary would be a good choice? That seems to be the only rationale I hear.
Does she have any accomplishments during her 30 years in the public spotlight? Checking her Congressional record, she only authored 3 pieces of legislation (2 of which were renaming of Post Offices, and the other was just as meaningless).
What else is there?
breathless hyperventilating
Oh, Jonny, “breathless hyperventilating” is what the post modern media does. Lordy!
Painfully, tediously, excruciatingly detailing the towering obviousness over and over in a cliché roundtable of usual suspects and children of usual suspects.
HRC, as secretive and spontaneous as a High Mass, is studied like an Ebola germ while aspects of much more serious issues like ISIS/ISIL are played with an immature silliness and dangerous ignorance of events that could only originate in a self-centered clutch of bloated and pampered courtiers…
That’s about it. She’s a hawk, she isn’t a economic populist, yes she is starting to talk up income inequality, but very carefully so as not to piss of Wall St.
1 Like
Well it isn’t just the media all those “Ready for Hillary” folks have been hyperventilating since 2009.
Man, I’d love to wake up in a country that could elect Bernie Sanders.
I mean we couldn’t- could we?
She’s a great choice.
For the MIC, the 1%, and “Free Trade”.
The rest of us, not so much. Not that just about any Republican would be far worse.
We need to do better than Hillary.