Discussion: House Republicans Return To Capitol To Face Leadership Mess

Discussion for article #241860

The sun came up. It’s another day. The leadership mess lingers. The Republicans cannot get their act together. The Republicans cannot lead. Sigh


7 Likes

So instead of The Devil and Daniel Webster, we can have The Devil is Daniel Webster?

5 Likes

This would be much more fun to watch if Boehner would, in the end do his job and bring clean debt limit and budget bills to the floor for the grown ups to vote on while the children are squabbling.

16 Likes

We reap what we sow! They made this mess, so we’ll see if they can clean it up.

1 Like

Somebody needs to send the “Freedumb Cockus” a good pocket calculator.

Having the ability to cause problems, be disruptive, rile people up, does not need a majority.

However, running the show and enacting your agenda requires a majority. There are what, about 40 members of their group?

For the benefit of any Tea Partiers, see the equation’s below.

40 < 218
40 < 247
40 < 435

Or here are some percentages:

40 / 218 = 18%
40 / 247 = 16%
40 / 435 = 9%

18% < 51%
16% < 51%
9% < 51%

See me after class.

20 Likes

Boehner is one of the architects of the extremism in the GOP.I hope the GOP dies out just like the Whigs and the No Nothing Party.
GOOD RIDDANCE GOP !

5 Likes

“What difference does it make at this point?”

1 Like

In truth, this “leadership mess” has been going on for quite some time. Boehner may have been Speaker, but he was most certainly no leader. We’ve had the tail wagging the dog for years now and looks like nothing’s going to change.

I hope they choose the most conservative member they can find, they shut down the government, and that Obama shuts them down. Unfortunately, there will be innocent victims in the short run, but this may be the only way to put the reprobates in the corner once and for all.

3 Likes

Bbbbbbuuttt
all they need to do is bring their list of accomplishments forward and promote them to illustrate their “leadership.” Finding a new stooge to put at the forefront of that Republican record should be easy
no?

Following Boehner should be a snap
well, considering the cesspool the Republicans have from which to choose a new ‘Dear Leader’:

5 Likes

House Republicans Return To Capitol To Face Leadership Mess

AKA: Tuesday

13 Likes

It’s interesting how much time these people have to talk about their own career interests.

Can we get a minute to talk about jobs
 or maybe


Time’s up. Back to discussing the challenges of being a Republican Congressman with a mere 6 weeks of vacation every month.

5 Likes

Mulvaney added. “Everybody’s interested in a new type of leadership.” Since Boehner led the GOP to the edge of the cliff, and then kept them from going over it; and since electing a leader that keeps the party away from the cliff is out of the question; I assume the “new type” of leadership is one that actually leads them over the cliff.

4 Likes

" even as hard-liners warn that Boehner risks more rebellions if he stays on past his planned departure date of Oct. 29."

Are they threatening to kill his dog now or something? What part of, RESIGNING, do they not get?

And it never even enters their tiny little pin heads, that the longer they throw a tantrum over anybody being Speaker, the longer the guy who has absolutely nothing to fear from them gets to stay in office.

11 Likes

Meanwhile, The Orange Lush, aka John Boehner, simply smiles and changes his tune from “It’s My Party (And I’ll Cry if I Want To”) to “Freebird”

â™Ș┏(・o)┛â™Șâ™ȘIf I leave here tomorrow
Would you still remember me?
For I must be traveling on now
'Cause there’s too many places I’ve got to see.

But if I stayed here with you, now,
Things just couldn’t be the same.
'Cause I’m as free as a bird now,
And this bird you can not change, oh, oh, oh, oh.
And this bird you can not change.
And this bird you can not change.
Lord knows I can’t change.â™Ș┛â™Ș┗ ( o) ┓â™Ș

Give the Tea Potty a little taste of the derision and disdain they’ve shown you. Givem’ hell Weeper Boehner
you’re Free At Last ~snicker!~ and in the perfect position to make them weep now!

3 Likes

I hope he does; my guess is that right now he is negotiating his post Congress job. He has to walk the same tightrope as he did as Speaker. He has the support of establishment Republicans, so that can secure him a sweet lobbyist/consultant gig. But if he does allow clean bills to pass his value as a lobbyist is diminished because he will be regarded as a traitor by the winger caucus. Sucks to be him.

It’s nice to see Ryan caught on the horns of a dilemma as well. So much for those fabled ‘Young Guns’. One got taken out for not being crazy enough, one killed his career by accidentally telling the truth, and Ryan is damned if he does and damned if he doesn’t.

4 Likes

Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, one of the Republican rebels, said he would consider forcing a vote to push Boehner out of the speaker’s chair if Boehner engages in “nefarious activity.” Massie defined that as “running the tables” on legislation not supported by a majority of Republicans. Boehner has suggested he wants to “clean the barn” before leaving Congress so his successor does not have a lot of unfinished business.

But Massie said he doesn’t draw a “red line” at the debt limit.

Massie is a young Bagger punk who doesn’t have the slightest clue.

3 Likes

What are the mechanics?

“That suggests that the same hard-liners who pushed current Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, to announce his resignation and scared off his heir apparent, Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., could throw up obstacles to Ryan, too.”

How did these hard-liners push Boehner into retirement? The largest number that people mention when referring to them is fifty. There are, maybe, fifty of them. There are 188 D members of the House, and they have zero ability to push Boehner around, because the House rules are structured, appropriately, to put the majority in charge, and the Speaker is the person who wields that majority power.

The only way I know of for the fifty to be able to threaten the Speaker is if they make the privileged motion that the Speakership is vacant, then vote with those 188 Ds to carry that motion. My understanding is that this means Boehner is no longer Speaker. But ex-Speaker Boehner could then, if there are only fifty of these guys and gals, win his caucus’s nomination to fill the vacant Speakership. When it then comes to a vote, what do the fifty do, vote Pelosi instead of Boehner? Not likely, so not a credible threat. Abstain, or vote for one of their number? Okay, they create a situation in which no Speaker is elected, and the House then has to keep voting until something gives and one can be elected. What, realistically, is going to give in that situation that puts these hardliners in control? The rest of their party is going to reward their behavior by giving in and voting against the candidate who won in their caucus, and instead vote for the hardline candidate? That doesn’t seem likely. As radical as the idea might seem if coming out of the blue unprovoked by events, this set of events would make it almost inevitable that the non-hardliners would form a coalition with the Ds to run the House until the next election.

This sequence of events illustrates why no D House member should ever vote for any R to be Speaker, or against the motion that the Speakership is vacant if the current Speaker is an R. If the majority party is so fractured that so many of its members are willing to vote against the majority of their caucus on the question of organizing the House that the remainder no longer constitutes the majority, then that party has fractured beyond the ability to run the House. It needs to be either nudged into getting back together by our side’s refusal to vote for either faction, or nudged into the final break in which the less-hardline faction joins the Ds in coalition. Our side wouldn’t be voting for a hardliner by refusing to vote for Boehner or some other non-hardline R, because if their factions are nudged back together it will be with the hardliner minority losing to the majority in their party.

That said, if this motion that the Speakership is vacant comes up in a situation in which the incumbent R Speaker has put up a clean ceiling bill, and Ds have to vote against the motion of vacancy so that that bill can be voted on in a timely manner, sure, in that case, plenty of Ds, enough to keep the incumbent in place, will pretty clearly vote for the incumbent. This is especially true in the situation we face right now, in which the incumbent Speaker has announced his intention to resign as soon as he gets that clean bill to a floor vote. But if that happens the hardliners have gained nothing, and have only suffered a humiliating rebuke.

My point is that I see no way this motion of vacancy works in the hard-liners’ favor. And if it won’t work, what’s the threat they pose? Why is anyone afraid of them?

3 Likes

So the need to raise the debt limit is immediate. The need to pass a budget is two months away. 40 idiots in the House are ready to crash the economy again (or at least run a high risk of it) and will likely suffer no political consequences in their own deep red districts (in fact it insures they won’t be primaried from the right). Don’t be surprised if America’s credit rating takes a hit just from all the uncertainty even if they eventually pass a deal.
Obviously Boehner must stick it to the Freedom Caucus on the debt by working with Democrats. The budget is a mere abstract at this point even though it’s but 60 days off. That same Freedom Caucus has made the position of Speaker toxic in the extreme (hard to believe six nobodies want it – who knew there was a small Masochist Caucus in the House?).
Now is a good time for some pro-business group or even the DNC to start running advocacy ads in the home districts of those 40, Let their voters know in no uncertain terms that raising the debt limit only pays the bills congress has already run up – otherwise it’s “dine and ditch” or deadbeat dad skipping child support. To be kind, their constituents are not well-informed – they think raising the debt ceiling gives the government a blank check. Remind them of what happens if the government shuts down. Attack the very sanity of the Freedom Caucus members, in their districts, and hopefully get phone calls rolling in. Fire a warning shot that they can also be attacked from center-right.
There is one upside to all this chaos. Unnoted are the looming sunset provisions of the Patriot Act. So there is a chance that, though we’ll be standing in a smoking economic ruin, we might actually get some of the 4th Amendment back. Silver linings.

2 Likes

I don’t see how Massie’s threat to kick out Boehner immediately over the debt ceiling or any other upcoming vote has any teeth. Democrats can vote for him and he stays Speaker. Of course, it’s a stopgap measure, and if he stops being sensible, he loses their support. But it means the crazies can’t just toss him on a whim before wrapping things up.