Discussion for article #233571
A contingency plan? Hereâs a simple one: A bill that will strike the language in the law that is at issue and declare that the federal exchanges will be treated as state exchanges for the purpose of giving out subsidies. Problem solved.
Except this isnât really about saving insurance for millions of Americans, itâs about an eleventh hour attempt at convincing Roberts that he wonât be robbing those millions of their insurance if he rules against the subsidies.
We have a private faith based voucher thingy. yeah.
Exactly, you donât need a new plan, just rewrite the law so that it says explicitly, everywhere, what everyone decided it meant for five years: that all exchanges qualify for subsidies.
But this âcontingency plan cominâ real soon nowâ schtick is garbage. All the yappinâ about ârepeal and replaceâ has given us hundreds of votes to repeal and zero to replace. Not to mention, Hatch can put any old thing he wants out there, but can he convince 15 other baggers not to filibuster? Can he convince enough House Râs to vote for it?
The obvious âcontingency planâ doesnât require any time to figure out, but the one he has in mind amounts to wholesale replacement of Obamacare, which they havenât done in five years and wonât do. And if the SCOTUS scuttles Ocare, watch them turn their hypocrisy amplifiers to 11 and blame Democrats for that.
The answer is ânoâ and ânoâ. But they will find a way to blame Obama for their inability to do anything in Congress.