I see that a lot in comments - I know it’s not only you. But this is the Democratic version of “Barack HUSSEIN Obama.” It’s pretty gross to flog xenophobia that way.
Besides, Jindal’s career is flaming out regardless. He’ll be the president of some “Bible College” in 5 years.
Louisiana has a lot of seats in its state house relevant to its population. As anyone from NH will tell you, that’s a recipe for some real cranks to wind up as legislators.
That said, it also means that campaigns and incumbency have traditionally been not that expensive to put forward.
So I guess I’m wondering, how did this yahoo find the staff and resources to throw together a website and put some lipstick on this pig of a campaign?
…Maaaayyyyyybeeeee… the money is coming from somewhere else?
Ah, but who? So much of America has been supplanted with the “gay agenda,” there must be some freedom-loving folk around. Maybe the LDS churches in New Orleans and Red Stick?
It’s no coincidence that this no account jerk throws an incendiary bill into the lower chamber and finds himself a cabal of backers at least rich enough to put a patina of professionalism around this goat rodeo.
“Can you imagine a hefty fine being levied against a lesbian reception hall owner for refusing to host a traditional marriage rally at her venue?”
I can imagine levying a fine on any business offering goods or services to the public that refuses some customers based on race, religion, gender or sexual orientation among other things.
Johnson continued that the bill would just stop the state from pushing certain views on gay marriage.
The state has no business declaring marriage to be the private preserve of opposite couples only…
But you aren’t following his train of thought (coal-powered, of course).
It goes like this:
Imaginary lesbian business owners are just as bigoted as real christian business owners, so the state should allow all of them to openly discriminate against customers.
Yes, and she should expect it. If she holds the hall out as open to the public for whatever, then she doesn’t get to discriminate on the basis of religious beliefs.
He’s stupid. What he’s suggesting would require that customers would need to consult the religious preferences of an owner before attempting to do business. It imposes a sort of religious apartheid.
