Yes, MSNBCâs acceptance of blatant idiocy on the left side (exampleâŚ?) is EXACTLY the same as Foxâs annual War on Christmas tripe they trot out every year. Santa was white, verifiable fact! The equivalent on MSNBC is⌠what? Anybody?
There is no story of sufficient importance for Glenn Greenwald. The truth crumbles before his exacting criticism. When Greenwald strokes his pen, only the most factual of opinions spurts out. Heâs the Chuck Norris of journalism.
Nor would he care for her to do so, since heâs gay.
Funny, but my kids, (late 20âs and early 30âs) and their friends, who are pretty politically savvy,call Glenn Greenwald, âThat right wing guy whoâs always whining?â
Most put him in the same category as Glenn Beck.
And anyone who strays outside Democratic party talking points, speaking independently, will be attacked by authoritarian Democrats like yourself.
Thank you for expressing the official position of the Democratic party so clearly.
Another cheap and poorly written hit piece on Greenwald from TPM.
YAWN.
I have a feeling you are simply making shit up.
Yes, clearly anyone who in anyway questions the undeniable truth that each and every word spoken by the Great and Infallible Glenn Greenwald is the entire, complete, undeniable, absolute, unvarnished truth is an authoritarian. By questioning whether every single word spoken or written by Glenn Greenwald is the absolute truth, I am attempting to impose absolute uniformity of opinion and therefore authoritarian!
Honestly, do you people ever listen to yourselves?
Honestly, do you people ever listen to yourselves?
When you live in the echo chamber, thatâs all you hear.
Yup. Thatâs pretty much the point of this hit piece. Make some kind of lame association between Fox an GG, and simply sit back and watch the fireworks. Itâs pretty transparent.
Sounds like your kids are as misinformed as you are. The apple doesnât fall far from the tree.
Whatâs illuminating was his need to dive into the comments to go after a commenter who dared take issue with him. It was that very tendency of his in his Salon days, that is, his tendency to dive into long, multi-hundred comment threads and heap the most caustic, scornful, and often quite personal, derision upon commenters who took issue with him factuallyânot ideologically, but factuallyâthat began my process of being majorly turned off by him. It was a deeply unpleasant kind of bullying, given the disparity of position, combined with a suspiciously hysterical degree of defensiveness that made me realize you needed to scrutinize what he said, and what his sources were, very carefully.
Oh, that and the fawning, subservient pack of devoted fans who, without the slightest evidence of self-awareness, would (and still do) attack Obama supporters as âcultists.â
Yes, he has often been right, both on big things and little and he has brought important matters into mainstream discourse that never would have gotten there without him. All credit due him is due and all honor for his contribution. But the consistency with which he turns nasty and personal whenever anyone undertakes to subject his work to critical scrutiny in even the smallest particular is telling.
Good God. Talk about a completely twisted interpretation of what Greenwald said.
But thatâs the entire point of this stupid article, isnât it? As a launching point for similar nonsense.
Thou dost project too much, Methinks.
Himself.
NahâŚif your kids think GG is right-wing, they are either colossally stupid or are being fed garbage information.
Name ONE âright-wingâ belief espoused by Glenn Greenwald. ONE.
No, they just followed his support of Bush, Citizenâs United and his opposition to gun control, AND⌠âhis my way or the highwayâ Bush/tea people mentality.
As Saul Alinsky said,
"One of the most important things in life is what Judge Learned Hand
described as âthat ever-gnawing inner doubt as to whether youâre right.â If you donât have that, if you think youâve got an inside track to absolute truth, you become doctrinaire, humorless and intellectually constipated. The greatest crimes in history have been perpetrated by such religious and political and racial fanatics, from the persecutions of the Inquisition on down to the Communist purges and Nazi genocide. â
You seem to be lacking that âinner doubtâ, but calling people who disagree with you âstupidâ will strengthen your argument.
Yes, Greenwald is totally a Bush âsupporterâ. ( Nowâs the part where you dredge up something from 2005 - Doremus can help you, he has it all bookmarked)
I guess Iâll go with âbeing fed garbage informationâ