Hey you two, get a room.
āJuth unethical leakerthsā
Oh thatās rich, Leaky Rudy, almost certainly the main force behind the FBI-NYPD conspiracy that led to Comey sending that letter to congress just weeks before the election, that inarguably put Trump in the WH (if you think that Comey did this on his own then you simply donāt know all the facts, it was WAY more complicated than that), accusing ANYONE of being unethical, let alone wrt to leaking.
Unlike what he did in 2016, these āleakersā (also known as sources, who btw havenāt leaked any actual specifics, and thus are not leakers) are just letting reporters know their frustrations with Barrās deliberate mischaracterization of the actual report, and failure to release either it or their internally produced summaries.
This is like Al Capone complaining that someone forgot to sign their tax return or took an extra sugar packet from Starbucks. Of course, this is for the base, those glued to Fox Nuz all day over 60 while male imbeciles and losers who are angry over no longer having their pathetic asses kissed by the rest of us and seeing the world pass them by and forget about them. I.e. Trumpās Million Moron Army.
Yes, those damn unethical leakers. These are the same people that punted on the question of whether Trump obstructed justice. They are clearly partisan Democrats with an ax to grindā¦ (working for Mueller, a Republican, appointed by Rosenstein, a Republican, nominated by Trump, the Republican president)
Classic gaslighting (that sadly happens on the left too), accusing your accusers of accusing you because they hate you, rather than because of what you didāwhich if they do hate you is why they hate you.
An extension of this idiocy is this whole āhaterā meme, that if you criticize something or someone, however legitimately or subjectively, you are therefore a āhaterā, whose opinion is worthless.
This is something that only literal imbeciles believe.
Yes, almost certainly, along with Kallstrom and various rogue FBI & NYPD types who intentionally milked the Weiner laptop story to damage Clinton. I believe that federal crimes were committed there and hope that Mueller or others have been looking into it.
Yep. A leak is when you leak actual information. Expressing your opinion is not leaking.
For whatever reason those guys donāt seem to realize that the pendulum swings and that when there is a different administration thatās more interested in ethical behavior and actual justice, they are in serious legal jeopardy. I look forward to that day.
As Giuliani said, thatās Munch ado about nothing.
To constitute a āleakā it must be true, no?
We donāt know that they punted. They may well have declined to indict for other reasons, specifically, because DoJ rules prohibit indicting a president, and indicting his kids would lead to his pardoning them and firing Mueller, as opposed to because they believed that they didnāt have sufficient evidence to indict.
āā¦disgruntledā staffers, ārabid Democrats who hate the President of the United Statesā¦ā Release the report then and clear everything up.
How about both.
Unethical leakers as contrasted with unethical liarsā¦simple solution and everyone understands thisā¦release the unredacted report and let the new wave of spin begin.
āThe conclusions: no obstruction, no Russian collusion of any kind?ā
Hey, Rudy? Even Barr didnāt claim Mueller said that. So why are you lying?
Rudy channels his inner Gollum:
āSneaky, tricksy those hobbitses. Canāt be trusted, my Precious.ā
I find it fascinating that they not only do this on Fox but on the most pro-Trump of all Fox shows. They have given up trying to change minds and are simply desperate to not lose any of the hardcore base.
That future investigation will have to take a number and get in line behind the WMD investigations.
and I canāt tell you how much false information they leaked during the course of the investigation
I can, Rudy. Zero. The Mueller investigation was the tightest-controlled investigation in modern history, with zero leaks.