It’s definitely as if both of them are intentionally and with cool calculation using his extreme predictability to set themselves up for primary runs, anyway. Only question is whether it’s a coincidence that Warren stepped back about the time Gillibrand stepped up.
12 Likes
Zero tolerance for men trying to kiss women. Broad and widespread tolerance for Wall St corruption.
…but hey, maybe she’ll actually visit Michigan and Wisconsin.
With Warren his smears have been more racist than sexist, but still sexist.
Trump went further down the sexist road here.
The only surprise is he didn’t include “on her knees and beg” before saying she would do anything for donations
7 Likes
seeing how its 11:50 in my neck of the woods…
6 Likes
Depends on whether or not there is a problem with the Big Mac/Filet-o-Fish order. If so, that will consume the rest of his day.
8 Likes
Let’s make it a blue hat.
7 Likes
Yes. Excellent. If we lay down a base coat of sexism-tinged purity pony slander on her and Harris now, we’ll be in an excellent position to poison the 2020 election if the voters once again steal the election from Bernie by giving other people more votes!
23 Likes
Wait…what? Can you copy and paste the part of my statement that was ‘sexist’? What about the ‘he tried to kiss’ me purity police? No stinging rebukes of them?
dun worry, he’ll have something ‘nice’ to say about Jane Sanders or Jill Stein in the future.
11 Likes
Take your sexist hatred of Ms Sanders somewhere else please. Thank you.
It is the typical Moderate Democrat response, make mountains out of molehills while you’re fucking people who work for a living. Keep it up.
Trump would call Jane Sanders a rank amateur when it comes to real estate fraud.
6 Likes
Didn’t he already win it once, though? Hillary successfully highlighted Trump’s misogyny, with a ton of help from the man himself. Then 53% of white women (and a lot more men) voted for the misogynist, because women, like every other demographic, have dynamic, complex political motivations. Simply being “anti-woman” isn’t a dealbreaker for most Americans, sadly.
I’m not at all suggesting that Gillibrand and others shouldn’t harshly condemn sexism and misogyny and sexual harassment and assault. I’m simply saying I fear this isn’t the big political winner it should be.
14 Likes
Funny, I don’t look like ‘45’, but while you here ‘St. George’, take this with you
12 Likes
“No whore! No whore! You’re the whore!”
9 Likes
Wait…what? Can you copy and paste the part of his statement that was ‘sexist’?
11 Likes
…he said while definding the ex NRA attorney and center right pol Gillibrand.
Oh look who her friends are:
Contributor Total Individuals PACs
Boies, Schiller & Flexner $820,893 $820,893 $0
Davis, Polk & Wardwell $618,940 $618,940 $0
Paul, Weiss et al $224,130 $224,130 $0
Corning Inc $208,120 $185,620 $22,500
Morgan Stanley $185,625 $162,125 $23,500
EMILY’s List $185,369 $174,244 $11,125
Pfizer Inc $181,303 $145,805 $35,498
JPMorgan Chase & Co $173,555 $163,555 $10,000
Goldman Sachs $173,040 $143,040 $30,000
Blackstone Group $164,600 $157,100 $7,500
Sullivan & Cromwell $162,875 $162,875 $0
Akin, Gump et al $151,965 $138,400 $13,565
National Amusements Inc $147,290 $132,290 $15,000
York Capital Management $145,400 $145,400 $0
Simpson, Thacher & Bartlett $137,833 $137,833 $0
Kirkland & Ellis $136,675 $136,675 $0
Womencount PAC $131,550 $129,050 $2,500
Skadden, Arps et al $123,560 $122,560 $1,000
Wachtell, Lipton et al $123,365 $123,365 $0
Quinn, Emanuel et al $118,875 $118,875 $0
^^^^ this ^^^^ 1000x.
You can really see her commitment to the working class, the same commitment that Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have!
are u sure about this?
2 Likes