M3Man said:
This is so Bill Clinton.
No, this is nothing like it. How like a Fright-Winger™ to try and equate the two.
While I love the Fright-Winger tm idea, you should check out a few of my posts to see if it fits me.
How do you make the trade mark symbol, anyway?
Did you read my whole post or just the first sentence?
Both Bills got caught and tried to manipulate the language to get out of it. Clinton’s was not an impeachable offense, but O’Reilly? I’d love to see him have to defend himself in a trial.
I’ve seen a hockey-mask wearing madman slaughter dozens of teenagers.
Where’s my book deal and TV show?
I guess Bill O’Reilly also saw pictures of the ‘blah’ moochers getting gifts from Obama for voting for him.
I saw stormtroopers kill Owen And Beru Lars.
I saw the Kennedy assassination, the D-day landings, the first phone call, the planting of the American flag on the moon and more!
I saw combat in WWII even though I was born in 1938. How did I do it? By osmosis as my Dad told me about his experiences as a radioman in a B-17 bombing targets in Germany.
I saw Gabrielle Anwar play Fiona on Burn Notice but all her explosions were on sets in Florida.
So, trusting BillO as an ‘expert’ that can explain armed conflict is sort of like trusting a ageing celibate old man as a marriage counselor. You don’t really get to understand the depth of the experience by looking at porn.
You kidding me? I was at the Battle of Gettysburg!
Some say it was photos, reenactments, school plays and dress-up contests that I caught, whatever the liberal media says!
When I think of the whir of of those musketballs, inches from my head, seeing the men cut down!!
ROTFLMAO____ “He saw photos of them…”
Guess that explains SOS BillO’s greatest achievement: “Climbed Mount Everest with Hillary and Norgay.”
We’ve all seen a lot of things on Facebook or Instagram that are pretty suspicious. If the average human being can understand that seeing something on a photoshopped image is not believing, why is O’Reilly basing his whole career on the premise?
I believe he said he didn’t have an opinion about that white and gold or blue and black dress. That might be the only photograph in history that he hasn’t centered one of his programs around.
I read the whole post and I disagree with your premise and the very idea that “This is so Bill Clinton.”
It certainly fits your bullshit false equivalency you posted.