Discussion: 'Fox And Friends' Shrugs At Stone Indictment: 'Where's The Collusion?'

“Everyone associated with Trump is charged with lying to investigators and obstruction of justice. Why would that reflect badly on the President?”

17 Likes

I’m really looking forward to the day when everyone on Fox - without missing a beat - starts asserting that, of course, Trump was never a Republican, and nobody they knew ever actually supported him. Because they’re leaving themselves no subtler way out of the corner they’re painting.

24 Likes

Although I appreciate the fact that other people watch Fox and report their inanities, this is hardly surprising. I think we can expect that any development is going to be met my a “meh’ until the development actually names a Trump, at which time it will be met with a 'it’s not illegal.”

4 Likes

Keep fucking that chicken Fox and Friends.

4 Likes

It’s on Fox & Fucks? Well, now Hair Furor knows about Stone’s indictment! Get ready for a diarrhetic Tweet-storm!

3 Likes

I guess “Russia, if you’re listening” and “I love Wikileaks” doesn’t mean all that much to f&f

5 Likes

F&F should be asking themselves, “if there was no underlying crime, why is everyone in any way connected with the Trump campaign lying about what happened?” “If there was no collusion with the Russians, why is everyone lying about their contacts and dealings with the Russians?”

You’d think that even these paid-to-lie robots would eventually wonder why there’s all this smoke but no fire. … On second thought, no you wouldn’t. No one who has ever watched them, even just in video clips, would think that for a moment.

10 Likes

12 Likes

They know who’s watching. And they know they have to soothe and calm him today, seeing as though Speaker Pelosi canceled the pony at his party. I’m sorry, meant to say the state of the union.

6 Likes

Those hammers are way, way smarter.

6 Likes

With Donald being the biggest liar of all, even he can can’t keep it all straight.

1 Like

We are at war with Eastasia. We’ve always been at war with Eastasia

7 Likes

“There were two cutouts between the campaign and the Russians here. Roger Stone and Julian Assange. Not just one, but two cutouts! I just don’t see how you can call that collusion!”

1 Like

haven’t been reading all the details but this is interesting if not really a surprise

6 Likes

once again, where is the Russia collusion? host Steve Doocy asked.

Once again, the SC investigation was NEVER about collusion. It’s about Russian interference in the 2016 elections.

The reason the GOP keeps changing the narrative to collusion is so they can force an end to the SC investigation by claiming it’s not finding a supposed smoking gun of collusion held by Donald Trump. But that is not the mission here.

4 Likes

Ah, but it is my fondest wish.

Hey idiots at Faux News. What the hell do you think all these people are lying about? I will even give you a big hint. Collusion!

1 Like

State-run Pravda claims what?

2 Likes

And that is how they aim to win. They’re counting on you pushing back on whether there’s “collusion” (whatever that means) rather than pointing out that’s not the mission and that SC is fulfilling its actual mission splendidly.

2 Likes