A woman judge blocking a draconian law that only effects women? Sounds like activist judicial bias to me.
… and the winning streak continues!
More winning, please!
Indiana had presented “no compelling evidence” to support its contention that the mandate would further its stated interest of convincing women not to have an abortion.
the idea that the ‘state’ has any compelling reason to try to convince a woman to not have a medical procedure is ludicrous on it’s face…
Glad to read. I think this the second or third part of that law that has been turned back by the courts. This is Pence’s view of the role of Government.
While I think he is a bit less unhinged and a little more aware that a reality exists beyond his bubble and sometimes has had to navigate and dwell in the larger universe outside the bubble, this hideous legislation that he signed included a provision that required women to have proof of burial and or cremation of any miscarried or aborted fetus. Hideous in intent and insane as a piece of legislation in terms of how would that be enforced?
Just a reminder as we wish for the down fall of Trump of what lies right behind him in Pence.
“fight for Indiana’s constitutional right to put a time requirement on our state’s ultrasound law.”
Now that’s a fight worth dying for.