Discussion for article #232058
Excellent!
If I lived in California, I would vote for this woman in the blink of an eye. That Sen. Warren supports her makes her even more appealing. I have seen her being interviewed several times, and have always thought that this lady is just the kind of young, rising star that the Dem party needs.
I’ve heard about her but know very little about her myself. I trust Warren’s judgement. If Jackie Speer ever decided to run however, I’d support her if I were a Californian. I like her too.
Lizzy appears to be a good judge of ability and character.
Kamala is wicked smart. We love here in California. I am so happy to live here in this wonderfully progressive, forward moving state with the best weather anywhere. Now if only we can have a few years of good rainy seasons.
That she is. I attended some fundraisers for her when she first ran and she is a very compelling woman.
This is why Warren is more valuable as a Senator than as a presidential candidate.
She can give added stature and credibility to candidates she endorses, and she is hella good as a fundraiser.
Too bad the timing isn’t better. I would much rather have her be the Cal Gov. which I believe would be a much better practical foundation for a presidential run than the Senate. I am from further north up the coast, but believe she is indeed a great candidates and will perform well in either office.
Yes. That and cheaper real estate.
LA = most unaffordable housing market in the nation. Hear me scream.
Otherwise, yeah, good to be in a progressive state.
WI used to be a progressive state that I was proud to adopt as my own.
I’m so sad in recent years …