I don’t think Fiorina is stupid, nor a loser. Losers don’t cop ‘golden parachutes’ after costing 30k workers their jobs. However I don’t think she has the verbal skills to go up against a guy such as Trump though.
Disagree.
On the other side of that aisle, there are GOP members that are likely saying the same about Hillary.
‘Ugly,mean,witch like…’
However if she wins both that nod and the general election, it wouldn’t surprise me to see GOP kingmakers rethink the product again. They don’t get it yet, its not the marketing that’s going to matter in regards to general elections. Its the product itself.
Non-sequitur. GOP members aren’t voting for Hillary anyway. Doesn’t matter.
We’re talking about who Republicans will vote for: Trump or Fiorina.
(Ugly, horse-face, shrewish. Never held public office. Destroyed a once-great American technology company. She’s going nowhere. Bubba don’t go for dat.)
So are you saying that on looks alone, if Palin was in the race now, she would have a better chance of Fiorina in regards to being a contender?
Not Palin now. Too old and frumpy. Maybe Palin circa 2008, when she still had a shred of visceral sex appeal.
But now, I think their odds are the same: zero.
Neither one has ever run for president. I think Fiorina is running for a VP nod.
In lieu of Perry’s departure, next week main debate could be titled ‘who wants to be a VP?’. The problem is that minus Trump, really none of them would impress an expanded base and only Cruz is seemingly capable of riling up the ‘cannibals’. So she would have to really impress in four days.