Probably transposed MN and NM, but yeah, they should fix it.
LOL⌠Only if youâre in complete denial and desperately trying to change the subject.
Oh, waitâŚ
My suspicion is that theyâre a clever mix of innocuous fact, negative spin, and deliberate falsehood.
Uh-huh, thatâs what you said about the last one. And the one before that. And the one before that. All of which were later shown to be completely true. Howâs that denial working out for you?
Cannot wait until we find out who the leakers are and can get some proper answers as to their motives.
How telling that youâre not interested in the substance of the leaks. And how sad that your attempts to redirect attention elsewhere are failing miserably.
5 Likes
I wouldnât share intel with anyone too close to Trump. Remember what happened with Nunes?
2 Likes
Yes, all very dodgy, which is why:
Lawyer up, Trumpski.
7 Likes
what he said
True - although you might expect that after the leaks yesterday he asked the question.
This seems a bit similar to the (what appears to be fake) leak about Comey requesting additional resources, which Rosenstein and his colleagues said nobody was aware of.
This is what our dear âobserverâ friend said a few months ago:
A lot of the comments about Trump are so depressingly similar to the reaction that tea party nutjobs had towards Obama. Iâm sure you think youâre justified and not bigoted, but of course so did theyâŚ
Together with all the Russian conspiracy theory stuff, quite sad to see how quickly the left in america has degenerated.
How very revealing, no?
5 Likes
That assumes that a) heâs genuinely interested in the answer, b) he knows whom to ask the question of, and c) that those individuals would choose to answer.
Except, of course, that you have no basis for assuming that the Comey request was, in fact, fake, other than the denial of someone who had a reason to lie. And, of course, you have no basis for assuming that there is any similarity at all to anything happening today other than the same one youâve had all along: wishful thinking.
3 Likes
Not at all. Heâs at a general hearing, not testifying as part of the investigation, so itâs reasonable not to discuss private conversations with the president. At the same time, his evasions essentially confirmed the story. Which means Trump is in even deeper shit.
5 Likes
Thatâs just it, he isnât. Though he survived this round, heâll get asked something similar in the future.
4 Likes
That seems like wishful thinkingâŚ
Put Coates in a private session and ask him again.
2 Likes
LOL⌠Oh, the ironyâŚ
4 Likes
If the WaPo report was false he would have categorically said so.
3 Likes
Perjury would be useful.