You go Team Hillary!
Kick MoDo and her brethren where it hurts! Right in their made up “breaking news”.
1 Like
Thank you Manhattan, I was wondering if I was the only one that remembered that.
Me too! But cancelled months and months ago after another bullshit article they spew as “breaking news”. If it’s NYT and they’re running a breaking news story, it’s usually a lie! And usually about dems!
Democrats should boycott the NY Times. Enough is enough.
1 Like
No, it’s not OK for any public official. Or it damn well shouldn’t be.
From gibberish to word salad compost in nano-second…my brain hurts!
Shouldn’t have done what?
This was standard procedure for all Sec. of States prior to her since email became a thing. On top of that,she is the only Sec. of State to date who has complied with the National Archives and State’s request for all work related emails to be turned over. None of the previous ones (all GOP) have complied.
2 Likes
So, has anyone in the Clinton camp refuted the part of the report that says she used her personal email server to send classified information?
So this is what it is going to be like from now until the election… ruthless, relentless, personal, destructive “reporting” of bald faced lies from the highest to the lowest level of the media. This champaign is going to be brutal and abusive like you have never, never seen before. A war of attrition that intends to seed doubt and fear within the Democratic Party.
I already see the results in these forums where people are second guessing and worried about Hillary. We all need to fight for Hillary, her election is far from assured. You have no idea how horrible this is going to get, they have nothing to loose. This is the fight of our lives, we need to be strong, we need to be disciplined, we need to be united. Or by God, they will win this thing.
3 Likes
The report didn’t say that the server was used to send classified information, and the Clinton statement was that no material was classified at the time it was sent.
The report said that the server contained classified information. The server would have the data from incoming emails as well as outgoing. If an incoming email contained classified data, but was not marked as such, the recipient would assume they possessed no classified info.
The real story is so lame compared to how the NYT has portrayed it. It’s an obvious attempted political hit job on Clinton. Shame on the NYT.
2 Likes
Thank you. Well said.
At the least for our quality of life.
The next POTUS will likely appoint at least two new jurists to the SCOTUS.
This is the real crux-- of where the country will be directed for the next 2-3 decades.
jw1
1 Like
Very strange on CBS this morning…a Jan Hopkins report that was heavily edited but still pushed the HRC criminal idea followed by another reporter, Paula Reed, who characterized the false criminal information as “confusion” without mentioning any of the after the fact bureaucratic actions that were used as the criminal element against Mrs. Clinton. CBS anchors then discussed Mrs. Clinton’s trustworthiness in light of the false information. “Uncharted territory” as the one anchor said without her tongue in her cheek…
1 Like
What this tells you is Jeb Bush is already the Republican nominee. The old Bush family contacts are showing up in the pages of the NYT… I’m surprised they didn’t go ahead and name check Judy Miller.
1 Like
The New York Times SNAFU’ed/FUBAR’ed the story. The Big Screw Up at the New York Times https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kEWn_ziqHLY 2) How the New York Times bungled the Hillary Clinton emails story http://bit.ly/1gTtyfA 3) Times Reporter Can’t Answer Questions About Faulty Email Story http://mm4a.org/1gahZ3n 4) Inspectors General Release Joint Statement to Clear Up Hillary Email Referral Flap http://www.mediaite.com/online/inspectors-general-release-joint-statement-to-clear-up-hillary-email-referral-flap/
The New York Times is no rag.
to that I say what I usually say – shut up Gwen.
That’s interesting to me. Do you have a source for that? And by “standard procedure for all Sec.of States” you mean running a private email server with a private email address? The slight risk doesn’t seem worth it because I can’t see any significant benefit to the practice.
It is a matter of public record that every Sec. of State from Albright (claims she rarely emailed) to Rice, to Powell up until Kerry when the rules in the Dept. where changed, used non-State Dept. email addresses for both private and non-private uses. The advantages is a single mobile device to carry around.
Google is your friend, use it.