You pose it as a threat, and you give the R’s the ammunition to call it “politically motivated”
Just do it, or don’t do it, and STFU Andy.
There’s good reason Rosenstein appointed Mueller without fanfare or threat.
You pose it as a threat, and you give the R’s the ammunition to call it “politically motivated”
Just do it, or don’t do it, and STFU Andy.
There’s good reason Rosenstein appointed Mueller without fanfare or threat.
You shouldn’t smoke crack so early in the morning, dude.
Assuming he gives a fuck about his kids?
Wrong.
.
Yes.
Two words: Ralph Nader
Two more words: Jill Stein
About F’ing Time. Anyone else but for this blowhard, would have had their personnel piggy bank shut down years ago.
He has stated that he does not do the “dad” thing. So from his own mouth _________ parent.
Good!
The threshold for a finding by the jury is different (beyond a reasonable doubt vs. preponderance of the evidence). Generally speaking, the rules of evidence of are the same, but can be applied differently given the kinds of issues that come up in a criminal case versus civil (evidence of prior crimes or prior bad acts, for instance). Rules of procedure, which dictate everything from filings to discovery to trial, are also different.
Yes.
And no more Club Fed!
I would prefer daddy trump living under a bridge and washing car windows for tips
Well, he doesn’t drink (they say), so let’s just put a pint bottle of Mad Dog 20-20 in his ragged jacket pocket just for show.
Playing with dangerous substances are we?
OK, fine.
Ripple. Pagan Pink.
Or any other fine vintage from Ye Olde Circle K.