Discussion: Cohen Turns Over Docs Showing Alleged Trump Lawyer Edits To His Testimony

Streams of lies, rivers of filth, a criminal in the White House

4 Likes

Go to the “Review” tab of the document, click on the picklist next to “Track Changes,” change “Final: Show Markup” to “Final,” make whatever changes you want and save it periodically. This is all you need to know, sir. Dealing with all the conflicting changes is the job of the poor sod who wrote the original draft.

11 Likes

Here you go:

5 Likes

We should not forget this is what the nation voted for. We asked for this, directly, when we went to the polls on 11/08/2016. That Trump and those around him were all criminals was known. And we voted him into office under the election laws of the nation.

6 Likes

Executive time.

2 Likes

Oh, I know this is true, but the evidence of the 11 checks hasn’t yet been turned over to the committee, right?

I’ll see your Sekulow, and raise you a Nielsen, a Miller, a Bolton, a Pence, a Hucksterbee, a Zinke, a Sessions, an Ivanka, a Jared, and a Jr…

9 Likes

It is not hearsay when the witness is under oath testifying that “Joe did X”. It would be hearsay if the witness were testifying “Bob told me Joe did X”. You can choose to doubt the truthfulness of the witness saying “Joe did X”, but that is not hearsay.

9 Likes

Stories about the checks are everywhere. If the media has seen this evidence, the committee has seen this evidence.

4 Likes

My wife and I were in the Cincinnati airport once (the one in Kentucky) at a remote gate we we were shuttled to. We were stuck there for hours with a delayed plane. It was the day both Gerald Ford and James Brown died.

After a billion loops of the TV news my wife turns to me in her news reader voice and says, “America mourns the loss of President Gerald Ford—The Godfather of Soul—who died today.”

11 Likes

We need to update our advent calendar…

18 Likes

I rarely use Track Changes. For long documents being reviewed by several people (like international arbitration memorials, which can run to hundreds of pages and pass through many hands) Track Changes is the quickest way to get a corrupted document that crashes at 2:00 a.m. When I circulate a draft and get back comments in TC, I review them and hand incorporate whichever changes I want to accept into the master draft, then a run a redline to show the changes. Then, of course, scrub the master version to within an inch of its life before sending it out.

No one touches my master document unless they want to die. :yum:

9 Likes

Lent will give you 40 days, you might consider a Lent Calendar.

6 Likes

I just remember him saying specifically he would have to get the copies from the bank before he could turn them over - that was only a week ago.

I would think that them having been delivered would get as much press.

2 Likes

Are there any longer ones? At this rate we’re going to need it.

2 Likes

Buzzfeed was not only right, but it looks like they undersold their story.

Trump didn’t just suborn perjury by ‘directing’ Cohen to lie. This wasn’t just coded mob language or stochastic encouragement as Davis and Cohen have both said. This was about Trump directing his attorneys to make sure Cohen’s statement to Congress aligned to his own story, which both Cohen and Trump knew was false. Since we have all the data in the world to prove that Trump’s story was false and that he knew it at the time (+ a witness to testify against him), Trump’s liability exposure seems much clearer.

As for the attorneys, I don’t think attorney-client privilege will protect them from being questioned. The crime-fraud exception would allow prosecutors to question bth Sekulow and Lowell. It’s clear that a material lie was told to Congress and that Trump knew it was a lie when it happened, and had more than a hand in defining and aligning that statement to match his own story.

What I don’t know, and perhaps @ncsteve can comment, is whether Sekulow/Lowell can get in trouble if they didn’t know that Trump’s story and Cohen’s story were false. I think a potential vulnerability for them is if Cohen’s original draft did not perfectly align with Trump’s story on this material question of when the TT Moscow discussions ended, and then Sekulow/Lowell deleted, edited or revised those references to make them align. That, to me, would suggest that they had a legal duty to do some diligence as to whether Cohen’s original draft represented the truth as he understood it. It feels like Sekulow/Lowell may have effectively coached the witness to avoid gaps or contradictions in the Trump-Cohen stories. That I think would be very problematic for both of them.

36 Likes

All kidding aside, I would imagine at least some of this took place through email, which would most likely be easier to prove than handwritten notes. Bonus: irony would be alive and well.

8 Likes

11 Likes

Would they need some kind of documentation to prove the mis-alignment? A calendar or something? I’m sure they have everything but how would they otherwise know about the mis-alignment of dates?

1 Like

An “Ordinary Time” calendar would go for about 33 weeks.