“…you would think CEOs especially are measured by objective criteria…”
Especially! Now there’s a conservative for you.
The fact is nobody is measured by objective criteria, least of all social conservatives.
“…you would think CEOs especially are measured by objective criteria…”
Especially! Now there’s a conservative for you.
The fact is nobody is measured by objective criteria, least of all social conservatives.
I don’t understand why the co-host’s comment was met with icy silence. If Cooke had outed himself in a speech at Auburn then it’s not like he’s in the closet or particularly secretive about it even if he’s not advertising it either.
Not only did I not know that Tim Cook is gay, I wasn’t even aware of the name of Apple’s CEO. Now I know both, and my life is immeasurably better, I’m sure.
A few days ago on NPR I heard them offer a correction when they said that there are no gay CEOs, the correction was that Tim Cook is gay. So, this doesn’t seem to be an outing at all.
Whooooooooooooops!
Let’s take a break and we’ll be right back.
Maybe no one noticed due to all the flying graphics.
Exactly. That statement about CEO’s being measured by objective criteria was the most outlandish statement in the whole segment. And he said it with a straight face.
Never mind the media snot storm, get to the only thing that matters.Which is, naturally, What happened to the stock price?
Sure, they’re sketchy on who’s gay or not. But I’m SURE they’re COMPLETELY accurate on all their important financial information!
Right?
the only “bi-curious” Cheney is, is bi-tchy.
Who the fook cares? I am only interested in performance as a stockholder. I don’t care if he’s gay.
These men could have contributed…in the 1980s or 90s…but now the fussy pretense or whatever it is looks ridiculous.