"Friends donât let friends vote for Trump"
Words to live by, Madame President!
Reductio ad AbsurdumâŚ
How many âproofsâ does one really need?
Clinton mentioned at an Iowa rally that Trump had made âcasual commentsâ on Tuesday that were dangerous,âŚ
Why pick on Tuesdays? Are the other six days safe from his âcasual commentsâ?
John Oliver really does have the most apt analogy to describe Trumpâs unending stream of outrageous statements:
âItâs the bed of nails principle,â he continued. âIf you step on one nail, it hurts you. If you step on a thousand nails, no single one stands out and youâre fine. That is how Donald Trump has managed to say pretty much anything in this campaign, seemingly without consequences.â
Go, Hillary!
Getting all the guns is just the first step in Hillaryâs nefarious plans âŚ
Itâll be the Teddy Bears next ⌠just watch ----
( I heard people say ⌠anyways )
Donât overdo it, Hill. Saying that youâre âhumbled and moved by the Republicans who are willing to stand up and say that Donald Trump doesnât represent their valuesâ is like saying youâre âhumbled and moved by the Republicans who are in self-denial.â
Considering the comments Drumpf has made, wouldnât the Secret Service have the right to off him if, during a debate, Drumpf made jerky moves toward Hillary or reached into his suit jacket?
I worry there arenât enough events in Hillaryâs life for the press to use as idiotic balance for every nutty thing out of Trumpâs mouth in the remaining daysâŚ
Seems like that bed has a spike in it labelled 2nd Amendment Solutions that someone forgot to file down, cause itâs sticking out like raised gun.
TPM, CNN & MSNBC, please ask your guests this question, âIn the greater context of the RNC cheer a few weeks ago, âLock her up! Lock her up!â led in mass by Chris Christie in the name of Donald Trump, shouldnât the 2nd Amend comment be taken very seriously and not casually excused?â Isnât the 2A comment just a hop and skip away from âLock her up!â? The greater context of the RNC tone needs to be taken into consideration here.
Then sheâs going to turn all the womenfolk into lesbians andâŚ
âŚsorry, I lost my train of thought for a moment there.
HRC: âDonald Trump simply does not have the temperament to be president.â
Echoing Lincoln, who said 150 year earlier:
âNearly all men can stand adversity, but if you really want to test a manâs character, give him power.â
Funny how the girl candidate stayed calm as the SS agents rushed her recently but trumpet tried to run away as they rushed him Youâve seen the images, no need to post them again on account of the nausea factor.
Trump: What good is 2nd amendment if no one uses it? My supporters donât like it to be wasted.
I like this analogy, but itâs clearly wrong. Trump has been hurt mightily by the evil shit that comes out of his mouth. One Republican after another, including the governor of the most important swing state, has snubbed him and refused to support or endorse him. Heâs polling so horribly among women and minorities that itâs doubtful anything he or Clinton says is going to change that. The fact that heâs got a loyal following whoâll not desert him no matter what he says or does, doesnât mean heâs not been hurt by his behavior. It just means about 35% of Americans would elect Hitler himself as long as he ran as a Republican. Thatâs a huge problem for our country, but it would be a problem regardless, and that has little to do with Trump.
Oh, donât worry. The RWNJ media has a conspiracy theory factory cranking out falsehoods 24/7. Theyâll never run out of lies to feed the lazy cowardly press.
Right now, for instance, theyâre blasting full speed ahead on the âHillary had a DNC staffer killedâ and âWikileaks reveals that Hillary illegally mixed State Department business with Clinton Foundation businessâ conspiracies. Theyâll wring a lot of mileage from those before they make up new ones.
Trump wants the 2nd amendment to take Hillary outâŚbut, ironically , his excessive use and abuse of the 1st amendment will end up putting the nail in his coffin.
It could be El Pendejo was advocating the assassination of SCOTUS Justices appointed by President Clinton and not the actual assassination of a POTUS. Or it could be argued the other way around given his poor command of English. Thanks to a raving lunatic both possibilities are now more likely.