Shut up, you fat, pandering, piece of shit.
It’s only a shame that the victims of the gun crimes you’re helping to encourage can’t be limited to you.
“And quite frankly, if I had the choice now I’d make
New Jersey a state where you could have a shall-issue on conceal and
carry,” he said. “Now, our legislature won’t do that, but what I have
done recently is to make sure that we’re making it easier for folks to
be able to get a permit in New Jersey because they deserve the right to
do that as law-abiding citizens."
TRANSLATION: “I have run out of buses to throw people under.”
That’s right, Tubby. This will totally turn your beached campaign around.
Translation: I fully support a future terrorist by providing him unlimited access to guns and other related paraphernalia. New Jersey: We make world class Terrorists.
But he can’t change his mind about how FAT and CROOKED he is (hee, hee).
Unfortunately, they end up peeing on us.
So, is Christie claiming here that he was a dumb-ass at 32?
Once again Krispy proves he’s all over the map, literally.
Law abiding gun owners will never turn into non-law abiding gun owners! I have an unrestricted right to own and operate hand gun just like my unrestricted right to own and operate a motor vehicle! Oh. Wait, bad example.
Still the constitution says you can’t regulate my gun ownership. Here “A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
See it’s right there in the language, unregulated!..oh…wait.
Run to the right to get votes, too late for you I am afraid. And you seem sane compared to the others.
Really, it has nothing to do with punishing innocent gun owners. They may be inconvinienced depending on the law but that is it. Every single law on the books can affect innocent people. The wrong person can go to trial for a crime they never committed or go to jail for it. We do not worry about that though, just about somebody buying a gun not being allowed to buy a gun in a fast manner.
Seems like if that is the worry there should be a ton of others that are bigger issues. And if we are mocking Obama than he wants more guys to enforce these laws, nothing more really. And honestly, many of the laws present now are not that easy to enforce, as a prosecuter you should know that. Some states have taken the initiative and done things to help make things safer, but others have gone the other way. It is why state level solutions can be very questionable in these situations.
Arrrests and the like are great too. Harsh laws to punish those that commit crimes with guns more harshly may work in some respects. Still would not prevent anything from happening though. So it would go back to the original points about why have them? Even if there were a guy with a gun present in many shootings does not mean it would prevent anything. If 100% effectiveness is our goal than everything we have ever done is a failure.
Marvelous Lyrics - some of his songs are quite prophetic when you listen to them now.
Like “A Song for World War III”.
Actually, surprisingly enough, a fair amount of police officers, those I’ve encountered professionally and personally, do not agree with Obama and gun control. I don’t get it either. They tell me the most dangerous call is domestic violence. You would think they’d want to know about or prevent the existence of guns at those calls, but nope. That doesn’t even factor in to the equation. Gun control is unconstitutional. Full stop.
I believe he meant to say: “I am a filthy, lying piece of shit.”
So what were the facts or events that changed his mind?
Was it the repeated mass murders at Sandy Hook, etc. etc. or was it the fact that the NRA has the Republican party in its pocket and he can’t win the nomination unless he toes their line.
Oh, I see your error, CME. You are assuming that Republicans need to make sense when appealing to their base. Nothing could be further from the truth. They just need to spew random sentences with the right phrases embedded and their wacko followers will somehow glom onto a meaning that they will love. "gun laws against aw-abiding citizens’ and “enforcing gun laws strongly against criminals” pushes two hot buttons. The ammosexuals salivate and Chrispie Creme wins.
Or in other words: “Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.” Only two questions I’m interested in hearing answers to:
-
Do you think psychos and terrorists should have easy access to guns, yes or no?
-
If no, what do you propose doing to make it harder for them to get access to guns?
‘I’ve Changed My Mind’ About Gun Laws
“I used to be rational. But, then again, I’ve changed my mind about donuts also.”
F*ck that guy.
Sweating bullets
When Christie flip-flops, is there a delayed reaction from all the fat trying to catch up?
Proof that some people do get stupider (and more repulsive) as they age.