Her main problem is that she should run as a Republican. They already have 4 convicted felons running.
Nowâs NOT the time to be trying to just make a fâcking point âŚ
Weâre in the middle of some serious shit(hole) here â
[quote=âclunkertruck, post:22, topic:67290â]
Weâre in the middle of some serious shit(hole) here â
[/quote]
Seriously, No shit!
Or maybe he doesnât want to be a part of whatâs being planned?
Ah but heâs retiringâŚso no duck jammies in the Halls of Congress.
No shit Sherlock!
Who?
Grimm is one; whereas Blankenship and Arpaio were convicted of misdemeanors.
Would you care to explain (or justify) this criterion?
Thanks.
Yes, especially against a popular incumbent.
Assuming sheâs running to make a point, what might that point be?
And why not now?
She âkilled usâ?
While I think Manning is 100% unqualified for public office, it is not because of Manning being a transperson.
It does however have everything to do with being a traitor, criminal and wholly unqualified to hold a Senate seat.
flagged
Chelsea craves attention. Jane Stein might endorse her.
Danica is inspiring.
Chelsea, your 15 minutes were up 5 years ago. We dems did what we could for you getting you out of prison. Thatâs way more than enoughâŚ
Please go away and enjoy your life; the rest of us got this.
Stupid thing to say alan. The reason Manning shouldnât get into this race isnât because sheâs trans, itâs because sheâs an unstable grudgebearer that has proven her narcissism on multiple occasions. Weâve already got that disaster in the White Houseâmy Maryland doesnât need her crap in the Senateâor more importantlyâderailing this Senate race with Stein-like idiocy.
I met her after her big win in November. So proud of her.
Oh. Just crimes. Sorry:
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/joe-arpaio-2018-election_us_5a563b5ae4b03417e8743168
Yes, and I forgot about Gianforte.
Thanks.