Nothing too Briet was ever fomented from old born to the manor Andrew. Took issue with west of the 405 lefties because he could, not because he brought anything to the table.
The only thing bright about this site is when they light a match to their bart.
As a suggestion perhaps the next Presidential nominee should be someone named âJoe Smithâ, the right smear machine wouldnât be able to smear the right person prior to their nomination. At least it would slow them down.
The article lies more than just once about Loretta Lynch, the nominee. In 1997 she was the U.S. Attorney who prosecuted the cops who tortured Abner Louima and nearly called him. She was not on Louimaâs âdefense teamâ at all. She did not in any way, with or without a team, âdefendâ Louima, she prosecuted the perpetrators of the crime of torturing him. He had his own defense lawyers, which did not include the sitting US Attorney of the district where the crime by the police took place.
This is the problem with satirical news sites like Breitbart, Fox News and The Onion. They are entertainment not news sites that people mistake for real news. But since they are not news sites, journalistic ethics do not apply. The irony here is that Breitbart doubled down on its pretend news ethics by publishing a faux correction to its piece intended to entertain.
There's just one hitch: the Loretta Lynch Obama nominated to his cabinet and the Loretta Lynch who served as one of Bill Clinton's defense attorneys during the Whitewater probe are two entirely different people, as Media Matters pointed out on Sunday.
ROTFLMAO! The Google giveth and The Google taketh awayâŚ
I was chatting with this guy yesterday who seemed fairly reasonable. He claimed to be a moderate â a moderate what he never said, but I figured moderate was a good thing no matter what it referenced. Then, out of the blue, he said he believes that Obama is not an American. He said it didnât bother him, that Obamaâs performance as President was far more important than where he came from. I was flabbergasted. If you believe, as Donald Trump and the birthers do, that Obama is not an American, then how can you casually rate his performance as President? If you believe that bullshit, that Obama is not a natural-born American, then Obama has never legally been the President of the United States. Itâs not something you can put to the side while discussing foreign policy or immigration reform. How do you say youâre more concerned with Obamaâs performance than with his legal right to be President? That makes absolutely no sense to me.
Funniest take on right-wing-nuttery to appear here in a while! I was going to suggest just one missing teahadi buzzword - Ben-gazzzz-ee - but WWSS took care of that.