Discussion: Biden To Make First Public Appearance Since Women Started Coming Forward

I thought he would announce his candidacy this week. Doing so at a union event would be a nice touch.

1 Like

Iā€™ll check Joe off my list as a possible as soon as he says:

ā€œWhen youā€™re a star they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything.ā€

ā€œI did try and f**k her. She was married," he said on the tape. "I moved on her like a bitch, but I couldnā€™t get there. And she was married. Then all of a sudden I see her, sheā€™s now got the big phony tits and everything. Sheā€™s totally changed her look.ā€
Remember tRump was married and wife had recently given birth.

Yea, let me know when that happens AND let me know when tRump will be held accountable for what he said and did here:

The 23 women who have accused Trump of sexual misconduct

4 Likes

Joe - yes, you are still sharp - yes, you have the best interests of the nation at heart - but right now you are 76 years old - you will be 78 at your inauguration - and yes, I have no doubt that you could lace up the gloves, step into a ring and gloriously beat the snot out of that puffy clown Trump (Iā€™d buy tickets) ā€¦ but you do not have to - and you do not have to willing walk into the relentless character assaults that will be launched at you - you can do more good mentoring others .

1 Like

Obviously, his appearance in Georgia did not go well:

Now of course more people will be paying attention to Biden, curious about what he will say from here on out. Iā€™m wondering if this ā€œscandalā€ actually boosted his possible run.
Guess weā€™ll see.

Ruth Marcus of WaPo quoted Oliver Wendll Holmes -I think I saw it on Ari Melber:

ā€œeven a dog distinguishes between being stumbled over and being kicked ā€¦ā€ Oliver Wendell Holmes, jr.
This is one of the things I donā€™t get about Lucy Flores and othersā€¦Flores complaint was that he space was invaded. Joe will get into the race, and it is good that this is all surfacing now ā€“

More problematic for Joe IMO (although maybe not against donald, should Joe pass through the primaries) ā€“ The Ukrainian time line in conjunction with Bidenā€™s son Hunter. Have been looking into this and would like to hear Biden explanation. If it was quid pro quo ā€“ as the far right paints it, then it would/should disqualify Biden.

Most of what I could find was from Brietbart launched by the same guy who wrote ā€˜Clinton Cashā€™. No doubt that did some damage to Hillary. Found one more moderate report-- link below. Does anyone know where this one bottoms out?


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2014/05/14/hunter-bidens-new-job-at-a-ukrainian-gas-company-is-a-problem-for-u-s-soft-power/?utm_term=.e1d38013fddb

If, as some part of the report hints, the particular ousted prosecutor was corrupt, and the process to get him out was unrelated to the kidā€™s employment - it still looks pretty bad.

Hopefully when this goes ā€˜mainstreamā€™ there will be a true answer. Making very sensitive women feel uncomfortable isnā€™t the same ball park as using USA policy for financial gain. That seems such a trumpian/Republican thing to do. Anyone know the bottom line?