Discussion for article #239694
1 Like
It seems like the āpaid deleteā charge is the most serious. Every site promises data protection and all have vulnerabilities, but this proves that even when charging members for the privilege of true data safety, they werenāt taking the most basic precautions. Owch.
2 Likes
Itās all TedCruzās faultā¦Damned Canadiansā¦
Trying to deprive FineUpstandingChristians their Jo$h and Je$u$ approved hook-up siteā¦
Is Ted going to get a check? HEāS Canadian.
1 Like
No matter what the hackers say, Iād bet even money they got suckered into buying a membership by either a totally fake profile or by a gently laundered solicitation for prostitution.
A company that promotes infidelity as its business plan is also unfaithful to its clients as part of its business plan. The union of avarice and lust.
3 Likes
He said he never cheated and never met up with any members of the site.
He likely couldnāt have met up with any members of the site if he wanted to, unless he was interested in a gay affair. It turns out there just werenāt that many women thereā¦
Rafael. Call him Rafael. Itās his name. Remind everyone. Itās Rafael āTedā Cruz.
1 Like
Itās amazing that these people join this web site and then theyāre all upset when someone finds out that they are dirtbags! I donāt see them prevailing with their lawsuit.
1 Like
Am I the only one who notices that the guys who have been caught all claim that they never met any women from the site?
This all boils down to: Weāre suing your ass because you didnāt give in to blackmailers.
This whole story is funny on so many levels, very sad on others, but more tawdry than any of the writers on āAs The World Turnsā could ever conceive. Gawd Bless America ā¦ and Canada.
Same goes for Piyush Jindal, AKA Bobby Brady of the South.
Theyāre all doing oppositional research.
Can they afford to pay $578 million? They mustāve hit on a need and filled it I guess?
They seem like they have the allure of porn mixed with the cheating thing. Look at Josh Duggar, a pervert that is doing his thing all over the place winds up there.
Itās fairly predictable actually.
Yes. While I know no one broke any laws by joining that site, I have very little sympathy for these alleged victims (who, through their actions, sought to victimize their spouses, after all). It seems to me the courtās perfect rejoinder should be, āYou know, you made the decision to join in rather tawdry behavior to begin with.ā
1 Like
Absolutely, thatās exactly how I see it as well!