Are we sure he wasn’t thinking of his commitment to Amendment V?
“Are we sure he wasn’t thinking of his commitment to Amendment V?”
I see what you did there.
It was hilarious!
I’m sure all the NATO countries are completely comforted and reassured by this…
They are already making other plans.
Man our national credibility is in the toilet and for good reason.
The Rest of the Free World: “Nah, we’re good, thanks.”
Oh, like we’re supposed to believe you NOW?
Hope Congress can act quickly enough
Trump may have meant he’s committed to “The Fifth Element” and to Milla Jovovich, in particular.
So in the omission to the context of the question asked (Russian’s threats to the security of the old Satellite states) is he really saying “Of course we will act if anyone attacks any member - unless of course the attacker is Russia - that’s a whole different story.” How reassuring.
Before, when he didn’t say it, he actually didn’t need to say it because of course he supported it and everybody knows that it’s so obvious and you must be stupid for even asking, so why does he need to say it again?
So then, Trump is also a Russian asset?
He answers questions like a high school student who didn’t do the reading.
Beat me to it; I came hear to say I can’t wait until Scaramucci compares this climb-down to Reagan’s famous “On second thought, Mr. Gorbachev, I’m good with the wall.”
Of course he is. He doesn’t need to defend European countries from his friend, Putin.
Another day, a different shit show.
It sounds incredibly like the “disavow” speech.
Committing to Article 5: A magnanimous act by a magnanimous man made magnanimously after he’s alienated every magnanimous ally we used to have in NATO.
Next up: He will promise to magnanimously promise to magnanimously quit disclosing intelligence secrets so our magnanimous allies can again magnanimously share intelligence secrets with us.
Now, watch this drive!
Yeah, but that’s today? By tomorrow it will be something different. Our allies are right. He’s unreliable.