Comments still aren’t working on some posts, so I’ll put this here as well.
Bastards.
Comments still aren’t working on some posts, so I’ll put this here as well.
Bastards.
He certainly likes to use commas.
I like that in a person.
Last one. I wonder who this guy supports in the presidential campaign
hahaha!!
I just noticed it because I’m guilty of the same thing, creating really long sentences that could be much more concise, but because I have more things to put in there, I end up with the stream-of-conscious style of writing.
…Like that…
I had to reread this story after all the hysteria here. So … precious Chelsea takes a cheap and public shot at Rep. Omar, saying Omar is trafficking in anti-semitism, then goes to a public vigil where she is attacked for her comments by an activist. I see two assholes here, not one.
And then, for some reason, Bernie is brought into the discussion. I’m guessing b/c Rep Omar supports Sanders’ campaign. Wow.
Ignorance is bliss. Proven once again.
You seem to be reading an awfully lot into Chelsea’s tweet that doesn’t appear anywhere in her tweet.
Activist? Clearly this person is more the crazy stalker type, no? I can imagine that person berating someone, but an activist? Hardly.
The legacy of the Clinton’s (truly Republican in all honesty)
Bill Clinton was the best Republican the DNC ever put in the White House…Obama and Joe Biden were just as bad.
We need a real Democratic Party to remove the corporations from running our government…Clinton, Obama, Biden and the rest of that establishment needs to go!
Well, this is what was apparently in the tweet:
Chelsea Clinton, daughter of former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton and former President Bill Clinton, tweeted in response to Omar, “We should expect all elected officials, regardless of party, and all public figures to not traffic in anti-Semitism.”
And that’s offensive and a cheap shot? Looks pretty darn bland, doesn’t call Omar out by name or anything.
Bullshit. Obviously he’s one of those norwegian illegal immigrants, having anchor babies in texas.
This ‘activist’ is trolling and generally appears to be following the excitement=persuadability model pioneered by George Lincoln Rockwell, wherein outrages including violence create a heightened emotional state into which false ideas can be inserted and/or those with weakened resistance identified.
The NZ shooter pretty clearly was aware of that model and doubtless delighted his ‘products’ have gone viral. Whatever their motives, it would hardly surprise if this ‘activist’ had similar goals.
See an optometrist, double vision may indicate a serious problem.
It appears you disagree.
Just like the “activist” who attacked Chelsea.
Maybe you’re right but to me it’s addressed to Omar, based on Omar’s comment about AIPAC. Either way, when Chelsea uses her public platform, she should be prepared for push back. But for some reason, she becomes the victim.
Always the idiot, take a day off.
It was a reply to someone else who said:
Also rather bland and non-inflammatory.