Whether “this is actually arresting someone” or “what the court is obligated to uphold”, etc. has nothing to do with the issue. The issue is whether one is (1) guilty or (2) innocent if it never goes to court. If it’s the former, which is what the bill proposes, then it directly follows that one is guilty until proven innocent. To claim that it is instead innocent until proven guilty would be turning both logic and the English language inside-out.
1 Like