That’s pretty close to slander.
They aren’t continuously feeding them material…this happened how many years ago? How about a Trump incestuous wishes movie?
2 Likes
You lost all goodwill with last night with your disingenuous charade. Nothing you have to say has any relevance here at all. You jerk off worse than Weiner.
1 Like
Figuratively…
…said another Hillary supporter! You make my point better than I ever could.
with no mention of a Hillary/Huma lesbosexxican scene in the movie, I’ll pass.
It serves no purpose besides that. That’s the entire basis of it. Nor do I expect it to be the last of these right wing crap propaganda films released this year. For whatever reason, they always seem to find money to produce these things every 4 years.
@1988RANGER is another recent ad troll wannabe. Fake photo, faux macho screen name, and recently added to only make derisive comments. Pay him no mind.
3 Likes
Simple. FOLLOW THE MONEY.
Find out who funded this “documentary”.
That will tell you all you need to know about it.
1 Like
Unless they play up Huma’s “steely calm” so that instead of just looking like a wife in a difficult spot, they turn her into Lady Macbeth. “Of course she’s Hillary’s closest aide – she’s as cold and calculating as her bitch of a boss!”
2 Likes
The next ‘big’ distracting thingy for the Reality Politics viewers…
Same old, same old ridiculous tactic. Let’s not forget what Citizen’s United was about originally, shall we? A movie that set the whole thing in motion by rightwing activists.
From Wikipedia on Citizens United:
In the wake of these decisions, Citizens United sought to establish itself as a bona fide commercial film maker, producing several documentary films between 2005 and 2007. By early 2008, it sought to run television commercials to promote its latest political documentary Hillary: The Movie and to air the movie on DirecTV. The movie was highly critical of then-Senator Hillary Clinton, with the District Court describing the movie as an elongated version of a negative 30-second television spot. In January 2008, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that the television advertisements for Hillary: The Movie violated the BCRA restrictions of “electioneering communications” within 30 days of a primary. Though the political action committee claimed that the film was fact-based and nonpartisan, the lower court found that the film had no purpose other than to discredit Clinton’s candidacy for president. The Supreme Court docketed the case on August 18, 2008, and heard oral argument on March 24, 2009.
And we all know how it turned out when SCOTUS got its hands on the case.
Now its a fucking free-for-all, which opened the floodgates for millionaires and billionaires to fund campaigns and candidates in ways never imagined…with full length movies just being one of them. But don’t hold your breath for the credits at the end of the movie to find out which ones.
Citizen United’s win destroyed the reining in of a massively corrupt electioneering process, by which laws once established under McCain-Feingold as more honest and somewhat more transparent, were now done away with. Money, SCOTUS determined, now equals free speech. Disgusting, but that’s where we’re at…and will continue to be until we change who sits on the Court. Needless to say, that can only be done if a Democrat sits in the Oval Office.
The rightwing nutjobs in the film industry are still trying out an old canard using the same idea as “Hillary, the Movie”. Its guilt by association (oh-me-oh-my, look who Hillary surrounds herself with).
I go for the more logical explanation that it’s really just six degrees of separation from Kevin Bacon. That’s enough for me.
1 Like
“Weiner” indeed.
With you there. Zzzzzz.
Genuine photo of 1988 Ranger:
2 Likes
cool!