LONDON (AP) — Prime Minister Boris Johnson has offered more insight into his hospitalization for coronavirus, telling a British newspaper that he knew doctors were preparing for the worst.
And where is his statement that he apologizes for making light of the virus, that his poor judgement put peoples lives in danger and that had he not acted like a jerk the NHS workers could have spent their efforts looking after people more worthy?
What is it about one’s character that it takes a personal trauma for them to process what seem to me rather basic causal relationships? And why are we choosing these kinds of people for leaders?
Over and over we see it. The only thing that ever changes the minds of MAGA-types (yes I know he’s in UK) is whether it affects them personally and vehemently.
Which is the argument I’ve had through all of this with the naysayers.
The naysayers have no one they know that has been in any way affected physically by the virus and certainly have lost no loved ones. Until it happens to them or someone they love, it’ll be a hoax. It’ll be no worse than the flu. The numbers are artificially inflated. Everyone’s lying.
I FEEL that it’s all ridiculous (no basis in fact, but feelings controlling everything).
I posted an article elsewhere from the Australian news channel, channel 7, which gives the timeline of the virus beginning in January. It’s an interesting read. But I’m getting no takers to actually read the article, because they FEEL it’s irrelevant, despite the fact that Australia is starting its phase 2 re-opening process in the next week or so and at least one of their States has had no new cases for almost two weeks.
Irrelevant because it’s not the US. Irrelevant because it doesn’t support their narrative.
Irrelevant, because they FEEL it is. No basis in fact.
But like Boris, at some point, they’re going to be impacted by this. Not sure how feelings will respond to reality.
As almost all observers acknowledge, the Brexit campaign was thoroughly dishonest. Part of the enticement was a “Brexit dividend,” which they said they’d spend partly on the NHS to the tune of hundreds of millions of pounds per week in additional funds.
So … yes, people who believed this sort of nonsense would gladly buy chlorinated chicken if you were to advertise it appropriately – on the side of a bus, maybe.
It’s a little early for me to process the recursion, but I think the “vice versa” part you suggest would have to be some kind of critical mass thing in order to make sense. Maybe we’re seeing some kind of herd impunity social phenomenon?