Barr's 'Highly Unusual' Involvement in Roger Stone Sentencing Remains Murky

“I cannot do my job”
– Bill Barr

Oh, that’s why Trump considers him the worst Attorney General ever.

3 Likes

Another possible interpretation, equally corrupt but with an extra side of cowardice from tsf:

As in the article, Barr met with Shea, who agreed do to the defer-to-the-judge thing and stab his subordinates in the back. Barr reported to tsf that he had accomplished a lessening of the sentence. Then tsf started tweeting out the wazoo, knowing that the result was already guaranteed. Why: to magnify the impression of his publicly corrupt autocratic power. For Barr, it was an ETTD moment, but for everyone on the outside it was supposed to project just how closely tsf controlled law enforcement (see also the runup to january 6).

14 Likes

I’d like to see an IG report on all of Barr’s shenanigans with respect to the SDNY office (and regarding the “unindicted coconspirator in the Cohen case).

13 Likes

Sure - it might be worth kicking around for a bit & putting it up on a long stick and letting it hang in the village square … it was despicable - and clearly conveys the situational morals of the Trump regime

But … with the office of Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz having done a (Good Lord) a FOUR YEAR investigation - and basically the critique is - calling it a bunch of incompetence - while it may stink - A LOT … it does not seem like there is much to chew on - incompetence is not excusable - even if it is “Learning Curve” related …
But even if it is inexcusable - it does not look like there’s enough heinous stuff to make a real spectacle out of this - especially with such a lukewarm narrative provided by the office of Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz -

per Washington Post -
After a four-year investigation, the office of Inspector General Michael E. Horowitz repeatedly called Barr’s intervention in the case “extraordinary.” However, it said it found no evidence of direct interference by Trump and instead blamed “ineffectual leadership” by Timothy J. Shea, then acting U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., who was supervising the case and who had been on the job for two weeks.

10 Likes

Barr had “articulated his position”…
Aka: Trump says “No Prison” for Nixon’s illegitimate child.

5 Likes


6m

FM5PaBQUUAEACQT-2874409199

9 Likes

Barr to Trump: “Can you cut out the ‘Will no one kill this fucking priest?’ tweets?! That’s not how you’re supposed to do it.”

7 Likes

Another great article from Josh Kovensky.

I had almost forgotten how quickly the daily corruption became standard operating procedure in the Trump administration (can we even call that clusterfuck an “administration”?). The shuffling zombies of Republican administrations past found new brains to consume with Trump.

You can’t just drive a stake through their hearts - you have to cut off their heads.

21 Likes

Has anyone seriously considered the possibility that what went down with the Barr intervention in Roger Stone’s sentencing was pure corruption on steroids?

10 Likes

Doesn’t matter to the general public, apparently. No one seems to care, but we can take all the time to go after some non-existent financial deal involving the Biden crime family. [/s]

Goes with the old saying, those with the power make the rules. We have to win in November, lest we descend into autocracy or worse.

13 Likes

We cannot determine the truth because the people who know the truth will not share it with us … in any form, in any forum, in any way.

Moral of story: Hide the shit you don’t want people to know. And hide it well.

8 Likes

Who cares? I thought the Supreme Court ruled that the unitary executive theory is correct and proper? /s

2 Likes

It is a real shame the Senate Judiciary Committee (under Dick Durbin) and DOJ (under Merrick Garland, through the vehicle of a criminal Grand Jury) apparently do not have subpoena power, to force Barr and his underlings (and Trump himself for that matter) to testify under oath.

6 Likes

If you are entirely satisfied with the IG’s inconclusive, tentative non- finding, derived after putting noone of consequence under oath, then you are an extraordinarily incurious chap, to say the very, very, very least.

5 Likes

Crooked republicans protect crooked republicans. Question: Why are the republicans not going after Melania for falsifying her Visa application the way they went after Hunter for falsifying his gun permit application? They love gun owners and hate illegals yet they say nothing.

10 Likes

I don’t think his involvement is highly unusual at all. On the contrary, it’s de rigueur for him.

Bill disBarr has been covering for career criminals ever since he was admitted to the bar. He has never “practiced” law per se. He abets lawlessness, for which he’s needed no practice.

Fact is, he’s been the Hans Frank for every slimy Rethugliklan piece-of-shit since the Reagan era.

11 Likes

Be nice if a former prosecutor could clean out that corrupt crowd of fascist lawyers.

11 Likes

Better yet, if Harris is elected they can (and should) finally aggressively go after all these career criminals.

10 Likes

5 Likes

No, please reread my point - and do so from the perspective that I would absolutely want to run with this - it is rancid - - but for the next 103 days we have to be ruthlessly pragmatic - and triage actions based upon the strategic potential of each issue. Bluntly- as many punches as possible have to connect & have a payoff.

Yes - this investigation was a shit show - that it took four years - four freaking years! to wander through this ineptitude is beyond absurd. How you conclude that I am accepting any of this bullshit investigation as OK … is frankly odd.

But I will say again - 103 days & every battle has to be chosen wisely … this was a FUBAR that was both 7 years & 4 years on the making & the investigation blundering makes it a mess that won’t be untangled in the next 3 months.

Kick it around for the obvious disgusting ineptitude that it represents … but it isn’t worth spending any major “committee investigation” time right now… especially when it would require a fair amount of new investigation to uncover facts that would make bit possible to pursue a line of questioning.

7 Likes