Angry White Dude Waddles Hard Into Black Reporter’s Live Shot In Ida-Hit Mississippi

[schmed]

@tacoma

if you have heart issues and someone shoots you and you die…then it was the bullet that killed you

Perp: He died of natural causes!

Cop: You shoved him off the roof.

Perp: Gravity’s natural.

[dizcuzted]

@mikebnews

Well now that that’s settled, should we debate “waddles?”

I’d have gone with “trundles”.

[Roger_Bradshaw]

@ajm

If the races of both parties in incidents like this are not revealed we will never learn if a racial pattern is involved.

So that headline showed us that a racial pattern was involved? One incident doesn’t show us that any pattern was involved.

[Roger_Bradshaw]

The police have reported that the truck had Ohio tags. So all of the comments that are based on the fact that he must be a racist because he’s a white dude from Mississippi should illustrate how thin many of the assumptions in this thread are.

[tena]

Because lord knows, Ohio isn’t a racist state or anything.

hahahahahahaha

[ajm]

Ever hear if driving while black?

The problem is not the assertion, the problem is whether the facts asserted are true or not.

[ajm]

One incident is one data point.

You can’t count things if each thing is dismissed for being just one thing.

[Ethics_Gradient]

Glad you’re back.

[Anarchy_Bunker]

@schmed

Both are assumptions that you’re making. Did you confirm with him/her what he/she knew before posting or when he/she learned my ethnicity? (rhetorical question, I’m presuming the answer)

He called you a white guy which you corrected later. This is a fact.

@schmed

You need to understand the concept of chronology.

I do, which is why I pointed out as a fact yours is wrong. Your race wasn’t known until YOU make it a point in response which you admit above. Your argument is actually proof I’m correct.
Concern trolling, got it right.

[schmed]

@ajm

Ever hear if driving while black?

Yes, I do it every day.

@ajm

the problem is whether the facts asserted are true or not.

This assertion?

@ajm

many instances with such a pattern is a matter of common knowledge

…which responds to…

@schmed

In that case, a competent reporter would put this incident into the context of the pattern and thereby validate the characteristic as the operative factor.

…? That assertion still dodges the pertinent question: do you see any evidence of that kind of reporting in this TPM story?

I await your germane response.

[schmed]

@Anarchy_Bunker

He called you a white guy which you corrected later. This is a fact.

Bullshit. You said he didn’t know I wasn’t white until I made him aware of it. You called that a fact. It remains unproven. That remains your assumption until you can demonstrate it. That’s what facts are: verifiable.

@Anarchy_Bunker

Your race wasn’t known until YOU make it a point in response which you admit above.

That was never in dispute. What was and remains in dispute is whether or not you can prove what he knew when he posted. You haven’t yet. I suspect you never will. But being such a ahem ‘fiend’ for consistency, you never disappoint.

ETA: Whoever keeps flagging my posts, please man up and let me know to my “face” what’s so offensive. You’re being childish. Grow up.

[Anarchy_Bunker]

@schmed

Bullshit. You said he didn’t know I wasn’t white until I made him aware of it. You called that a fact. It remains unproven . That remains your assumption until you can demonstrate it. That’s what facts are: verifiable .

I base that on the fact of his assertion. I did not claim he KNEW. I can only go ON WHAT HE POSTED, I do not read minds. You’re a liar.

@schmed

That was never in dispute. What was and remains in dispute is whether or not you can prove what he knew when he posted. You haven’t yet. I suspect you never will. But being such a ahem ‘fiend’ for consistency, you never disappoint.

ETA: Whoever keeps flagging my posts, please man up and let me know to my “face” what’s so offensive. You’re being childish. Grow up.

This was never a point or a dispute at all except to mock you for being even less accurate than those you’re wailing at. You’re a ridiculous liar as a fact.

[left_in_washington_state]

Hey Tena!!!

How are you feeling? Everyone has been asking about you!

[schmed]

@Anarchy_Bunker

I did not claim he KNEW.

Let’s go to the video tape:

@Anarchy_Bunker

@schmed

Fact not in evidence, sir.

That is a fact. He did not know your race until YOU made him aware of that. You’re getting worse not better.

@Anarchy_Bunker

He didn’t know when he posted nor should your race be at issue.

You flatly stated what he KNEW (your caps), i.e., what was in his mind. How you came to that knowledge is beyond my ken. Clearly, you’re the liar.

@Anarchy_Bunker

You’re a ridiculous liar as a fact.

You’re a troll with no skills and no credibility. Your stooping to pathetic name calling is emblematic of your forensic incompetence.

You’re dismissed, mountebank.

[Anarchy_Bunker]

@schmed

You flatly stated what he KNEW (your caps), i.e., what was in his mind. How you came to that knowledge is beyond my ken. Clearly, you’re the liar.

Gosh, I hope he DOES know what is in HIS mind. How I came to that ‘knowledge’ was via his post. Are you okay? You’re irrational.

@schmed

You’re a troll with no skills and no credibility. Your stooping to pathetic name calling is emblematic of your forensic incompetence.

You’re dismissed, mountebank.

And again, ‘facts not in evidence’. Whereas simply using your own posts, I proved you’re a liar. And it’s really easy to follow. It’s probably why you’re spewing with rage and not addressing the simple factual time line.
And, your reply here, proves it again.

@schmed

You’re dismissed, mountebank.

Fact in evidence: name calling hypocrite.

[schmed]

@Anarchy_Bunker

Gosh, I hope he DOES know what is in HIS mind.

You claimed to know what he knows or doesn’t know without providing any proof. Tell us how you knew what he didn’t know.

@Anarchy_Bunker

And again, ‘facts not in evidence’.

You somehow didn’t see your own quotes in my reply. How “conveeeeenient.”

@Anarchy_Bunker

name calling hypocrite.

Just returning the favor as I indicated here.

Have anything of forensic value to add? (hint: claiming to have proven something isn’t the same as actually proving it.

Back to you. Or not.

[Anarchy_Bunker]

@schmed

Have anything of forensic value to add? (hint: claiming to have proven something isn’t the same as actually proving it.

Yes, that is kicking your ass. Such as your ‘fact’ your assertion of being black makes you better qualified to address this topic. Prove both of your assertions.

@schmed

You somehow didn’t see your own quotes in my reply. How “conveeeeenient.”

Yet you somehow never seem to “quote” me, you lie about what was posted. As, the thread PROVES, and I use that word by intention, you’re a liar. Anything else, liar?

[Anarchy_Bunker]

---

Here’s you, an in fact liar saying I claimed he KNEW something when my actual words were
HE DIDN’T KNOW.
I don’t care what is wrong with you. Get help, you are not right in the head IMO.

[schmed]

@Anarchy_Bunker

Such as your ‘fact’ your assertion of being black makes you better qualified to address this topic. Prove both of your assertions.

I never made such an assertion. I simply dispelled the suggestion that I am white. What’s the second “assertion” that you contend I made?

@Anarchy_Bunker

Yet you somehow never seem to “quote” me, you lie about what was posted.

Ah, now I understand the term “ankle biter.” I listed every one of your statements; they are linked back to your comments in case you think I’m making them up. Please keep up.

@Anarchy_Bunker

Here’s you, an in fact liar saying I claimed he KNEW something when my actual words were
HE DIDN’T KNOW.

How did you know what he didn’t know? Comes to the same thing: you claim a fact which you can’t prove. You surmise, you induce, you guess. You don’t prove.

You steal my time, stultus.

[Anarchy_Bunker]

@schmed

How did you know what he didn’t know?

I don’t. Claiming I did was just another of your lies. Now prove to us your assertion you’re black and that it makes you better qualified to discuss the topic. You’re a diversion while I pinch one off.

@schmed

Ah, now I understand the term “ankle biter.” I listed every one of your statements; they are linked back to your comments in case you think I’m making them up. Please keep up.

Liar, you inaccurately paraphrased them. Can you make a post that is not in one manner or another a lie?