While I accept your point, I think there should be at least some consideration for to whom the cock is attached when deciding if and how to judge a person for the act.
I can’t find it now, but some time ago, maybe during the Obama administration or even before, Chris quite publicly criticized Mike’s defense of the media as not being liberal in its inclinations; Chris said something to the effect that his father had lost his way and may even have been suffering from dementia or something like that. I took that to indicate that this particular apple had fallen rather farther from the tree than is usual and that on the whole he was comfortable over there at FOX.
Take the metaphor seriously and not literally.
At the end of a daisy-chain that started with Putin.
Another reason not to watch CNN.
“Both of them, Katie…”
After Two Decades, Wallace Finally Got Fed Up With Fox. He Admits He Might Be A ‘Slow Learner’
You mean the one where I accept that gay sex practices are used colloquially to mean immoral behavior? The metaphor is precisely what I take offense to because it’s the adult version of calling something you don’t like “gay”.
I only call it out because I know you aren’t a troll and that kind of colloquialism can get lodged in our own personal vernacular without malice. I’m maybe hyper-aware of the affect of language, like most people who are part of the alphabet mafia, especially given the right’s targeting of lgbt kids and clear disdain for Obergefell.
Mike Wallace, Chris’ father, would have interviewed Rupert Murdoch and his son who’s running things now, and it would not have been pretty for them. Chris? Not so much.
“I think Fox has changed over the course of the last year and a half,” Wallace said.
He’s not wrong, but I find it fascinating that the supposed moral line here is when you go from stoking the fire and handing out the torches to defending the burning down of the castle. Such a strongly developed sense of morality!
I shouldn’t have to point this out, but In this context, the colloquial refers to sycophancy not immorality.
Lighten up, Francis. It’s bloody well self-evident that Chris Wallace would not enjoy sucking Fat Boy’s dick for four and a half seconds, much less four and a half years. Therein lies the metaphor, in that he did the rhetorical equivalent of the act he now professes to abhor for said four and a half years. I remain firmly in favor of consensual cocksucking.
New revelations keep pouring out, e.g., the sun rises in the east.
Slow Learner = Sold His Soul For a Handsome Paycheck
Your statement comes with an assumption that the viewer has the capacity to think. A dubious assumption, at best.
Is this supposed to be a selling point for CNN+ subscriptions?
Assumes intelligence not in evidence?
The Truth will set you free. The view from outside the bubble can be enlightening. May it be so for Chris Wallace. If he is serious, he will call out their BS and disinformation for what it is.
Oh, please. Eff this guy. He waded through sewer sludge for 18 years, and THEN it dawned on him that this place is poisoning civil society? O’Reilly and Beck and Bolton and Liddy and Kelly and Stossel and Santorum and Dobbs and Ailes spewed racism, misogyny, LGBTQI hate and related garbage no less efficiently than the current crew.
And thanks, NYT, for awarding this clown a big fat promo piece for his new show.
I’ve always imagined Mike would be spinning in his grave over his son’s position.