The active Darwin experiment
We thank them for volunteering
They don’t care They want to die…and they all shop for their wardrobe at the same Army surplus
Impressive collection of goobers Wot?
22 Likes
Oh yes the total number is more accurate for sure.
2 Likes
These numbers are not of concern to the orange thing. The only numbers he cares about are those he can use to prop up his failing presidency.
5 Likes
Is this the men’s side? The women’s side must be around the building.
15 Likes
Where did that number come from? The sites I have been following have put it between 2000 and 2500 for the last several days. There was a big one day jump when they started to include deaths likely caused by CV19 and apparently put them all in at one time rather than include them in the days the deaths occurred. Even with the new method of counting, as defined by the CDC, the numbers are still obviously an undercount. I wish the article had given a source, or at least a plausible explanation of why the numbers went up so fast.
9 Likes
A perfect score indeed, Mr. President.
1 Like
Fox, trump: you built that.
8 Likes
What percentage of people are willing to return to restaurants, stores etc until we have testing? The reality is the workers at essential businesses don’t want to be there.
8 Likes
The case/death count compiled at Johns Hopkins University is the gold standard.
16 Likes
It’s a little known fact that being “sick of winning” has exactly the same symptoms as being “sick of COVID-19”. The liberals refused to test these people; so how do we know they aren’t “dead of winning”?
5 Likes
The WSJ article cites “an analysis” of the Johns Hopkins dada. Can anyone get the Johns Hopkins GIS page to show deaths by country by day? I’m not having any luck, and none of the other data sources have anywhere near 4000 deaths in the US yesterday: https://gisanddata.maps.arcgis.com/apps/opsdashboard/index.html#/bda7594740fd40299423467b48e9ecf6
4 Likes
That is a gem. And sadly accurate.
1 Like
Ask yourself, who turns to Dr Phil for advice?
6 Likes
Same. I smell WSJ intern math.
5 Likes
Got a text from a relative on Easter (no joke.) “Jesus rose so we’ll all rise and all be up in heaven soon and together again!!!”
Yeah, she’s in that deep.
8 Likes
I’m wondering if where these numbers came from that a bunch were just now added in. The reason I say that is the site I look at had it close to 2200 for yesterday and the total here and from my site are about equal.
Not sure this is an accurate one day count.
2 Likes
And every private trucking company he shows depends on the USPS. My. God. Trump’s. An. Idiot.
9 Likes
If you go to worldometer you will see a spike for one day of over 6,000 deaths due to.a backlog of covid deaths not previously logged as such.
5 Likes
No matter how the bodies are counted, the tragedy is they did not have to happen.
We can’t tell much from one day’s worth of statistics. But the over time averages show U.S. has the highest rate in the world. Considering how bad it was in Italy, we are in deep doo doo. Thanks Donnie.
Meanwhile back at the Ranch Covidians have been stampeded to infect as many of the herd (formerly citizens) as possible. That has been the plan all along.
5 Likes
Ok, but 6000 is not 4500, as WSJ is claiming. I know of the NYC reclassification spike, but there’s no corresponding chart spike on the Johns Hopkins GIS site.
3 Likes