Yes, more likely Conway.
While I also agree with the âfine lineâ belief, its hard for me to have sympathy for â45â, a guy who is likely the biggest beneficiary of the 1st amendment.
O/t
yup
If Iâm reading this correctly, there were over 18,000 ads run for the GA-06 election? 18 THOUSAND ads? OMGâŚ
Part of a thread.
Now AA hasnât said what was percentage of neg ads between the parties.
Neg ads are normal. Its an unfortunate part of American politics, but still normal.
However its up to the voter base to recognized whether or not they are being lied to.
N without realizing that there is more to that tweet, Bernie fans are likely salivating over that.
I donât understand what youâre saying⌠what is the âmore to that tweetâ?
Yup
There is an argument (n in some cases, gloating/ Curt Schilling) that the DNC money sent to Ga #6 was essentially a waste of either time or money.
The thing that needs to be found out is: what % of Handel (or Round 1) ads went towards negative ads and whether or not Ossoffâs staff did anything about that?
The tweet #3 is about the runoff? Itâs not entirely clear which breakdown each of the tweet exactly refers to, but the campaignsâ spending and outside groups spending combined it doesnât sound like Ossoff has any real, significant advantage.
Uh, so, you mean BS fans are saying Ossoff should have gone negative?
After all, outcomes justifies everything. Ever noticed how those people are conveniently contradicting with themselves depending on different situations? They say Obama has been too nice, lofty speeches wonât cut it, etc, as if we should be like GOPs, all the while keeping bashing Hillary for her attacks of Trump insisting âjust being anti-Trump doesnât do itâ âDems should have had a more inspiring candidate,â etc., when she presented detailed (and to me, inspiring enough) ideas.
More so that he was an âempty suitâ and that he was just going for a âone trick ponyâ (being against Trump).
So happy that Bernie riled up a whole cadre of armchair quarterbacks who do little more than sit around telling everyone else what they shoulda/woulda/coulda done.
The house is on fire, people are trapped and may not get out alive and Bernieâs on the front lawn yelling about the smoke alarm waking him up!
(my patience is at an all-time low right now, and the human and canine with whom I live can attest to thatâŚ)
I will never forgive and forgetâŚ
Thatâs got to look pretty f__king terrifying to another squirrel
Maybe OT but not too much. This was two days ago â was the story posted at TPM? I was a bit swamped at work so may have missed it.
Donald Trumpâs unprecedented actions as president are stacking up daily, but this is a truly new one: A top FBI official will not say whether the president is an âunwitting agentâ who aided Russia during the 2016 presidential campaign.
Bill Priestap, the assistant director of the FBIâs counterintelligence division, testified before the Senate Intelligence Committee yesterday. He said that Russia âemployed a multifaceted approach intended to undermine confidence in our democratic process,â including efforts to âdiscreditâ Hillary Clinton and help elect Trump.
âDid Donald Trump become an unwitting agent of the Russians?â asked Sen. Martin Heinrich, D-N.M.
After a long pause, Priestap said, âI canât really comment on that."
@inversion
@spencersmom
@irasdad
@tena
@matthew1961
@chelsea530
@squirreltown
@leftcoaster
@antisachetdethe
Letâs be honest about the threat that Johnny Depp poses. He could possibly drunkenly knock dumpâs phone out of his hands. Would that really be so awful?
Also⌠(vid clip embedded)
Iâm gonna just go ahead and assume Priestapâs hesitation was over the qualifier âunwittingâ.
That Trump was an âagent of the Russiansâ is hardly in doubt.
I was thinking the same.
Aside from that though, the mere fact that he GLOMARed this is just⌠wow.