Discussion: Stone's Supposed Assange Intermediary Released From House Intel Interview

One of my private pleasures is that I worked the musical “A Little Night Music” in my (possibly misspent) youth, touring it around Australia for almost a year. With that as preamble, I present:

1 Like

Or to quote Bette Davis (on the death of Joan Crawford)

“You should never say bad things about the dead, you should only say good . . . Joan Crawford is dead. Good.”

I’m hoping and trusting that we can morph this to apply to Donnie soon…

This. As I pointed out in an earlier post this evening, what we are seeing is censorship, and it’s a long established principle (ref. John Gilmore) that ***“The Internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it”***. I explain in more detail how this works in the real world:

1 Like

When I saw this Friday morning, that was exactly my first thought.:grinning:

“If you’re innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?”

  • Republican Nominee Donald Trump, September 2016

"because of Donald Trump"

No further comment needed, there’s our answer.

Breaking news: Former liberals call amass for the head of their former darling, Assange (and Snowden)! You gotta give the FBI and CIA a hand for pulling that one off. Next thing ya’ know, you’ll have all kinds of intelligent people claiming the FBI is an even handed and non political force for true justice. Much as I hope these guys get Trump, I think we need to remind each other that when you or I look around the poker table trying to figure out who the mark is, that invariably means that the mark is…you or I.

So do you think there is incontrovertible evidence that Wiki leaks and/or the Russians who stole Hillary’s emails?

1 Like

Yes, and I think the computer forensics probably confirm it.

Actually, no one with a brain is gonna talk to an FBI person about anything at this point, no mtter what they have done or not done. His taking the 5th is the smart move even if he’s done nothing.

But he’s not dealing with just the FBI, but k.

Not really. You guys are as confident of this poorly unsupported shit that you hope will sink trump as the paranoid idiots posting at Consortiumnews.com are confident of the conspiracies of the deep state to hang a poor innocent Trumpkin. Y’all ought to get together sometime and see who’s the least rational…

You out yourself by claiming this “shit” is “poorly supported.” The entire IC community here and abroad have the same fucking evidence.

You’re going to get the shock of your life if you don’t believe Trump worked with Putin to throw the election. I hope is stuns you utterly

Shades of Merry Fitz-mas… I’m increasingly finding the premature glee around here to be sort of depressing.

1 Like

I hear you, but if you follow the thread, it was an expression of solidarity with Tena who was expressing hope for big things, not assuming they were already happening.

Comments are now Members-Only
Join the discussion Free options available