Not an open question for me. Art, literature, music - we pretty much have to separate the art from the artist, or we’d have very little, because some of the greatest and most thought-provoking works have been made by people who were transgressive in one way or another. Sometimes those ways are despicable on their own terms (e.g. the Picasso example you cite) and sometimes it is just being more progressive than their current culture allows (Jane Austen publishing under an androgynous pseudonym). Censorship - and make no mistake, that is exactly what MPR is doing - is rarely a sound decision.
I think about early twentieth-century Russia, where samizdat was passed around secretly because certain individuals were banned on account of their less-than-ideal politics. Or Nazi Germany disposing of “degenerate” art. For a recent example, the Taliban blew up Afghanistan’s iconic monumental Buddhas in Bamiyan.There must be any number of great works which have been lost to history, or never created in the first place, because the makers were seen as either incapable or as a threat.
If they take his work off the air, fine. But removing it entirely from public consumption is troubling.